'; }, onSelect: function(e, term, item){e.preventDefault(); window.location = item.data('url'); }});});
- Gear
- Ski Boots
- Tecnica
- Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro
Brand: Tecnica
Boot: 2018-2019 Tecnica Zero G Pro Tour
Stated Flex: 130
Available Sizes: 22.0-31.0
Stated Last (size 26.5): 99 mm
Stated Range of Motion: 55°
Stated Forward Lean: 12° (can be adjusted to 13°)
Size Tested: 26.5
Stated Boot Sole Length: 303 mm
Blister’s Measured Weight (size 26.5):
•Shells, no Liners: 1099 & 1100 g
•Liners, no Laces or Footbeds: 211 & 210 g
•Shells + Liners: 1310 & 1327 grams
•Stock Insoles: 30 g each
•Removable Spoilers: 16 g each
Buckles: 4 magnesium buckles with wire clasps
Powerstrap: 45 mm with hook closure
Shell Material:
•Cuff: Grilamid Co-Injected with Carbon Fiber
•Shoe / Clog: Grilamid
Soles: Rockered, full Vibram rubber (ISO 9523)
Binding Compatibility: All “tech” / pin bindings; MNC Bindings
Tech Fittings: Dynafit Certified
Compare
What do you think about Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro?
Write a review
5
4
3
2
1
4.7
6 reviews
27/07/2022
Strengths:
fantastic top touring boot with good riding characteristics
Weaknesses:
Expensive.
Buy the cheaper Scout or Tour model instead.
Summary:
have a pair of TECNICA ZERO G Tour since a couple of years (the cheapest model in the series)
just bought a pair of Pro Tour with flex 130 to update. BUT there is no difference between these in flex/stiffness
("it says "carbon-injected" on the expensive Pro model. Notice no difference)
My cheap tour boots have slightly thicker/nicer/warmer insoles that weigh 120g more than the more expensive Socut and Pro models.
Model year: 2020
Translated by Google ・ Show original
Filip1234 (Guest)
11/11/2021
Strengths:
The lightest summit hiking boot to go real rides with, comfortable to go with also has a hard membrane with 130 flex and they are not affected by heat. Good angle when riding and the walking position also comes with posts if you want an even more aggressive angle forward. But you can go with everything.
Weaknesses:
Could have been the weight but it is built well. But with a slightly thinner inner shoe and a narrower load and narrower buckles, you save a lot of weight.
Summary:
The best summit ski boot for long days but also works in the lift system in humps and bumps. Works well in poor snow conditions. Ride with shift bindings.
Model year: 2021
Translated by Google ・ Show original
05/11/2021
Strengths:
Stable, good walking position
Weaknesses:
Summary:
Best boots I've had, had to print them a bit but that depends on my duck feet
Model year: 2018
Translated by Google ・ Show original
02/11/2020
Strengths:
Weight in relation to performance is performed. Fit. Proven design. Ladder compatible. Light, simple and good powerstrap. Easy to adapt for those who need.
Weaknesses:
Unusually cramped at the ankle for hiking boots, if you are out with a tent in the middle of winter, I have to warm up with a nalgene bottle of warm water so that it is possible to get the foot down, not having to do them with previous boots. But I can live with that based on how well they otherwise work.
Cold about the waterfalls if they start to be -25 / -30 degrees or colder
Comes drift snow and wind is felt in the lower part of the shoe in the turn position. Ventilates better of course. Can be both an advantage and a disadvantage depending on the weather.
The riding position (lever) must be activated before the buckles are clamped for riding position, otherwise it will not work correctly. Can be a little disturbing in the beginning if you come from lighter boots with 1 or 2 buckles that often both buckle and change from turn to ride mode.
Summary:
Had them for 2 years now, I still consider them to be the best boot on the market in this category. Owned almost 10 different boots in the last 6 years, ranging from 800g to 1600g. Instead of owning 2 pairs of boots and changing depending on activity, I now only own these. Best compromise for me and rarely feels like I compromised! Recommended. 42-42.5 in regular shoes, run 26.5 on these.
Model year: 2019
Translated by Google ・ Show original
04/05/2020
Strengths:
+ Versatile and works just as well on uphill as performing
+ Good looking
+ Easy to use and easy to switch from riding mode to gait position
+ Good progressive flex and capacity to operate on the right heavy equipment if needed
+ Extremely good gait position for this type of "4-span damper"
Weaknesses:
None identified. If you want to go up slightly, for example, the inner shoes will be thinner and cooler, as weight is stored on all the components of the boot so you are aware of it.
Summary:
Should be one of the better ski boots if you just want a pair of ski boots for the whole mountain. Works great for full days on the slopes as well as full days with hides on the mountain.
Model year: 2020
Translated by Google ・ Show original
01/01/2019
Strengths:
Light
Good position forwards and backwards
Stiff, even but progressive flex
Anatomically good shape.
Weaknesses:
Not yet
Summary:
Feels like a cruel booty ride!
Unlike many other similar ski boots, the walking position is not good just backwards but also forward.
Flexet works well with the boot, has not gone through the flex but it stiffens well.
The buckles and powerstrap are easy to use when you learn, is a bit of a wait.
Feels like an anatomical shape that actually resembles a foot: D
Absolutely okay inner shoes, maybe not the one with the most volume or the stiffest but a good intermediate.
With smaller and lighter materials, they become less subdued, so if you travel most of the time in the system and take a few days, I would have chosen a heavier boot. Do you tour mkt, at least 50% of the days then I think these boots are just as good as any!
Translated by Google ・ Show original
